Bug zappers are ubiquitous in backyards and patios, promising a satisfying zap and the allure of insect-free evenings. These devices, with their enticing blue light and promises of pest control, have been marketed as a solution to annoying bugs for years. But do bug zappers really live up to the hype, especially when it comes to dealing with common flies? The truth, as revealed by entomologists and extensive research, might just shock you – and it’s not in a good way for the bugs you actually want to get rid of.
Why Trust Our Expertise on Bug Zappers
To get to the bottom of the bug zapper debate, we consulted with leading experts in the field of entomology and insect behavior. Our research included conversations with:
- Dr. Laurence Zwiebel, PhD: A distinguished professor at Vanderbilt University, Dr. Zwiebel has dedicated nearly four decades to studying insect behavior, with a significant focus on mosquito olfaction for the past 25 years. His work provides critical insights into what attracts insects and what doesn’t.
- Dr. Leslie Vosshall, PhD: A professor of neurobiology at Rockefeller University, Dr. Vosshall brings 30 years of experience studying insects, with 15 years specifically focused on mosquitoes and effective repellency strategies. Her expertise sheds light on the effectiveness of bug zappers against biting insects.
- Professor Jonathan Day: An expert in medical entomology from the University of Florida, Professor Day has been studying mosquitoes and other bugs for approximately 40 years, specializing in effective mosquito control methods. His long-standing research offers a practical perspective on bug zapper efficacy.
- Brian Provost: Representing Flowtron, a leading manufacturer of bug zappers, Mr. Provost provided industry insights into the perceived benefits and addressed common criticisms of these devices.
Beyond expert interviews, we immersed ourselves in academic studies and publications from numerous university extension offices to gather a comprehensive understanding of bug zapper functionality and impact. Our commitment to providing reliable information is also rooted in extensive experience covering insect control, including guides on bug repellents, mosquito-control gear, fly swatters, and ant killers. This deep dive into the world of pest management ensures that our analysis of bug zappers is both thorough and trustworthy.
The Shocking Truth: Bug Zappers Target the Wrong Insects
Image: Bug zappers use UV light to attract and electrocute insects, but are they effective against flies?
Bug zappers operate on a simple principle: they emit ultraviolet (UV) light, which is highly attractive to many insects. Lured by this light, bugs fly towards the device and are electrocuted by a high-voltage grid. While undeniably effective at killing insects that are drawn to their light, the crucial question is: are these the insects that actually bother us, like flies and mosquitoes?
According to Dr. Leslie Vosshall, “Bug zappers are good for attracting insects that are attracted to bug zappers.” This seemingly obvious statement highlights a critical flaw: the insects drawn to UV light are often not the biting pests we’re trying to eliminate. A revealing study from the University of Delaware meticulously tracked the carnage of six residential bug zappers over a 10-week period. The results were stark: out of a staggering 13,789 insects killed, a mere 31 were biting flies, including mosquitoes. This translates to a dismal 0.22% effectiveness against the very pests these devices are often marketed to control. Unsurprisingly, the study authors concluded that bug zappers are “worthless for biting fly reduction.”
Echoing these findings, the American Mosquito Control Association cites Notre Dame research indicating that mosquitoes constituted only a small fraction – between 4.1% and 6.4% – of the total insects zapped over an entire season. Colorado State University Extension succinctly summarizes the scientific consensus: “No controlled scientific study has shown that these devices reduce mosquito biting rates outdoors.”
The ineffectiveness against mosquitoes and biting flies is just the tip of the iceberg. The real problem with bug zappers lies in which insects they are effectively killing.
Indiscriminate Insect Slaughter: The Environmental Cost of Bug Zappers
The University of Delaware study revealed that bug zappers are indiscriminate killers, eliminating “many thousands of nontarget insects representing a rich taxonomic diversity.” This broad-spectrum insect destruction raises serious ecological concerns. The study authors caution that “Even if targeted biting flies were effectively controlled by electric zappers, the resulting destruction of thousands of parasitoids, predators, aquatic insects, and other members of the nocturnally active fauna would be difficult to justify.”
Professor Jonathan Day from the University of Florida emphasizes the broader environmental impact, stating, “We’re in a big enough crisis with colony collapse with honey bees that I think anything that impacts a beneficial insect population is problematic.” The widespread elimination of insects, even seemingly “unimportant” ones, can have cascading effects on the ecosystem.
One significant concern is the impact on the food chain. Bug zappers may deplete nocturnal insect populations, which are crucial food sources for animals like bats and nighthawks. By creating voids in the food web, these devices could inadvertently harm populations of insectivorous wildlife.
Bees swarming around a beehive entrance.
While honey bees are thankfully not attracted to bug zappers, many other vital pollinators are. Moths, for instance, are highly attracted to light and are crucial nocturnal pollinators. The US Forest Service notes that moths “take over the night shift for pollination,” and a 2018 study from the Universities of York, Newcastle, and Hull highlighted their broader role in pollinating food crops like peas and soybeans and their ability to carry pollen over greater distances than honey bees. Indiscriminate killing of moths by bug zappers can negatively impact pollination, with potential consequences for plant reproduction and even agriculture.
Another casualty of bug zappers is the parasitic wasp. Professor Day identifies parasitic wasps as taking “the bulk of the brunt when it comes to bug zappers.” These tiny, harmless-to-humans insects are invaluable biological control agents. As the Virginia Cooperative Extension explains, “They are very important in agriculture, attacking a wide range of insect pests that feed on important crops.” Parasitic wasps target agricultural pests like ticks, beetles, flies, caterpillars, and aphids, and the University of Maryland Extension suggests they may be “the single most important biological control method gardeners have.” Eliminating these beneficial insects is counterproductive to natural pest management and can disrupt ecological balance.
Professor Day’s long-standing opposition to bug zappers is clear: “I’m surprised bug zappers are even still around, or even still a question.” His 1997 and 2008 interviews underscore the consistent scientific consensus: bug zappers are ineffective against mosquitoes and biting flies, and their indiscriminate killing of beneficial insects makes them environmentally detrimental. Furthermore, Professor Day points out a counterintuitive effect: bug zappers can actually attract mosquitoes to your vicinity. Drawn by the light, mosquitoes may then be further attracted to human hosts nearby, essentially making the problem worse.
This negative view is widely shared. Institutions like Harvard Medical School, Iowa State University, and Texas Tech University Infant Risk Center all advise against using bug zappers, citing their ineffectiveness and harmful nature. The overwhelming scientific and expert consensus is clear: bug zappers are not a helpful tool for fly or mosquito control and pose significant ecological risks.
The Unappetizing Side Effect: Aerosolized Bug Guts and Potential Disease Spread
Beyond ineffectiveness and ecological harm, bug zappers have another disturbing downside: they can aerosolize bug parts. The electrocution process is so forceful that it can fragment insects, sending microscopic pieces – potentially including disease-carrying bacteria – into the air.
A 2000 study by Kansas State University researchers, published in Current Microbiology, investigated the “spread of bacteria and a bacterial virus during electrocution of house flies.” The study concluded that bug zappers “could play a role in the spread of infectious disease agents.” One of the study authors noted surprise at the extent of microorganism dissemination, with bug parts being propelled up to 7 feet away.
Professor Day acknowledges this potential health concern. He explains that if a fly carrying salmonella is zapped near a picnic table, there is a “possibility of bacteria on the surface of the fly getting dispersed out into the air and potentially onto your sandwich.” While he concedes that a fly landing directly on your food might pose a greater risk, the idea of aerosolized bug parts, possibly carrying pathogens, is far from appealing.
While indoor bug zapper use might mitigate some of the ecological damage, it doesn’t eliminate the issue of bug fragments. Furthermore, the bright blue light emitted by these devices can be disruptive, especially at night. While a bug zapper might eventually eliminate a single fly trapped indoors, the drawbacks and potential health concerns remain.
The Manufacturer’s Stance: A Different Perspective
Brian Provost from Flowtron, a leading bug zapper manufacturer, offers a contrasting viewpoint. He argues that with attractant cartridges, bug zappers can effectively kill mosquitoes and are used in areas seeking to reduce mosquito-borne diseases. Regarding ecological impact, Mr. Provost suggests that dead bug remains become a food source for other insects, minimizing disruption. He also disputes the claim that pollinators are significantly harmed, asserting that butterflies and honey bees are not attracted to the zapper’s light. Finally, he states that concerns about aerosolized bug parts are not a common issue raised by customers.
While customer reviews for bug zappers on platforms like Amazon are often positive, these are largely anecdotal. Without entomological expertise, it’s difficult for consumers to accurately identify the types of insects killed and assess the broader ecological impact. As pest control expert Joe Conlon points out, anecdotal evidence online is unreliable for evaluating mosquito control efficacy.
Effective Alternatives: Reclaiming Your Space from Flies and Mosquitoes
Instead of relying on ineffective and ecologically damaging bug zappers, there are proven alternatives for managing flies and mosquitoes in your yard and patio.
Dr. Laurence Zwiebel advocates for repellents, emphasizing, “Repellents don’t kill anything. They just say ‘don’t bite this, don’t eat that.’ Go off and live a long, happy life.” He highlights the key principle: “You want to push [insects] away, you don’t want to pull them in.”
-
Bug Repellent Sprays: For personal protection, repellent sprays containing 20% picaridin are highly effective and odorless, offering a superior alternative to DEET without plastic damage concerns.
-
Spatial Repellents: For patios and decks, spatial repellent devices release a vapor that creates a mosquito-free zone. These are effective in still air conditions.
-
Fans: A simple yet powerful solution. Mosquitoes are weak fliers, and a strong breeze from a fan disrupts their flight. Directing airflow low to the ground is particularly effective against species that bite lower extremities.
While futuristic solutions like the Photonic Sentry laser mosquito zapper remain a distant prospect, the readily available alternatives – repellents and fans – offer effective, targeted, and environmentally conscious ways to manage flies and mosquitoes without resorting to the indiscriminate killing of bug zappers. Choosing these alternatives not only protects you from annoying pests but also contributes to a healthier ecosystem.
